[BALUG-Admin] (forw) Re: Comcast Business apparently blocking 5353 UDP Re: linuxmafia.com "retry limit exceeded"

[Al]

Well, of course it's all improper.
I try to figure out what flavor of improper because Comcast seems to 
need help thinking.
I admit I have had no success in telling them anything, however.
I just wonder if they are doing something with MDNS/Zero-config that 
might have been part of a new s/w release, and they got it all wrong.
Or maybe they're changing policies and products, and somehow that leaked 
in to a legacy config and was of course broken.
Enquiring (ala Natl Enquirer) minds wanna know.

On 6/4/2024 18:14, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Al (awbalug@sunnyside.com):
>
>> Actually I take it back, 73.189.65.18 must be the WAN address of
>> Michael's modem.  That won't appear on a message from Michael,
>> unless somehow NAT got involved in the modem?  Not sure if that's
>> quite right.  I think NAT would come from the last of the assigned
>> static IPv4 addresses, but IIRC I have also seen messages from a
>> modem's WAN address.
> Interest, if so -- but nonetheless completely improper.  NOTIFY
> should only ever come from the domain master nameserver's IP.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BALUG-Admin mailing list
> BALUG-Admin@lists.balug.org
> https://lists.balug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/balug-admin