[BALUG-Admin] Spamtraps and http://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php?ipr=96.86.170.229
Rick Moen
rick@linuxmafia.com
Sat Jul 30 20:34:41 UTC 2022
I wrote:
> What does it mean to be listed at the UCEPROTECT-Level 1?
> It means abusive activity was seen from IP 96.86.170.229 directly within
> the last 7 days.
>
> Concrete allegation:
> IP 96.86.170.229 tried to deliver mail to spamtraps.
Progress: UCEPROTECT-Level 1 (and all other UCEPROTECT) DNSBLs no
longer list 96.86.170.229 . This is reassuring! It would be quite bad
if we had unknown spamtraps on the subscriber rosters. I'm still a bit
worried, in that it's troubling that at least one (allegedly) was _on_
the roster(s), raising (as I said) the troubling question of whether
there is a vulnerability permitting subscribing users without three-way
handshake confirmation.
Michael, I hope you will get around to confirming that the local config
to add a nonce (or whatever it's called) to the subscription POST data
is in place. That is non-default.
https://multirbl.valli.org/dnsbl-lookup/96.86.170.229.html now shows a
subset of six out of the (if memory serves) nine recently showing.
Vexingly, the postmaster.rfc-clueless.org one for FQDN balug.org (and
thus for lists.balug.org) is still there, although I asked removal.
I _hope_ this means that removel request is still pending.
Michael, I would still appreciate your attention to the remaining
entries on https://multirbl.valli.org/dnsbl-lookup/96.86.170.229.html .
Some, such as SORBs, really ought to be addressed by the system
siteadmin. (Again, for SORBS, create a SORBS login.)
More information about the BALUG-Admin
mailing list