Quoting Michael Paoli via BALUG-Admin (balug-admin@lists.balug.org):
Uhm, no, I wouldn't put Joker.com at the top of the list. In fact I'd rank 'em below competent. https://www.wiki.balug.org/wiki/doku.php?id=system:registrars#jokercom
_Cannot_ opt out of private registration? Deal-breaker for me. Not acceptable. (But wait...) I see this was officially proclaimed in 2019, as described here -- and revealed by... me. http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2019q2/013971.html
Back in 2019, that policy was proclaimed on https://joker.com/index.joker#gdpr , but, not a shocker, that URL no longer reveals fsck-all. And their FAQs are useless on this matter.
_2018_ page: https://www.ote.joker.com/faq/index.php?action=artikel&cat=5&id=476&...
Some of their documentation suggests that the price list will reveal domain pricing with vs. without WHOIS privacy. The current price list is unrevealing (https://joker.com/domain/prices), except, e.g., for .com, it _does_ suggest that the Registrant can opt either for WHOIS privacy or not.
I was irked by, and aware of, the "unable to repoint glue records" annoyance, but would have been willing to live with that -- if it's still the same, long decades after I ceased using their services.
Unfortunately, none of the others you catalogue appear to appeal at all, with the possible exception fo the ex-Google Domains Squarespace registrar -- which you portray as as question mark.