I did talk with Dick a bit earlier (evening of 2007-07-24).
It looks like we'll likely need to raise the BALUG dinner price
a moderate bit.
What we're looking at, is moving the price up to $13.00 ($12.00 per person
to go to restaurant, $1.00 goes towards covering speaker/presenter's dinner
at BALUG and/or other miscellaneous BALUG expenses).
This would be the first time in quite a while (probably at least 4 years)
that the restaurant portion would be going up (they've been getting the
same $…
[View More]10.00 per diner from us for quite a number of years now - and
that's including tax and tip).
Anyway, hopefully the additional $2.00 wouldn't keep too many people away.
At $12.00/head (to the restaurant) for all the food, tax and tip included,
and the presentation space we generally* have available to us, it's still a
pretty good bargain, ... and I think at least most attendees could reasonably
absorb the extra $2.00 in cost without too much (if any) pain.
*since we pay nothing extra for the presentation facilities, our basic
arrangement is we're subject to being "bumped" - i.e. if someone else
books the room (for $$) or the room is otherwise unavailable, we don't
get to use it - but most of the time, we have the room available to us -
at least for presentations and such (if we're not that numerous, they'll
often serve us downstairs - more convenient for them, and we also get
more attentive service downstairs - at least if we're a more modest sized
bunch).
So, ... not that we have a whole lot of wiggle room on the matter, ... but,
opinions/thoughts/etc.?
[View Less]
For the interested/curious:
2007-07-17 meeting attendance:
approximately 22+ (largest in a fair while)
21 dining with us on our regular restaurant deal
1 dining with us on separate menu and pricing
I think there was also a smaller bunch (approximately 4)
that seemed to want to join us for dining, ... but way late and
when there wasn't really any additional seating available with us - I think
they went to hang out somewhere else ("lobby", bar?) and may have joined
us for at least part of the …
[View More]talk/presentation.
list subscribers (does include also those with delivery disabled):
$ wc -l */memb*`date -I`
27 balug-admin/membership_2007-07-24
287 balug-announce/membership_2007-07-24
256 balug-talk/membership_2007-07-24
And a rough approximation of unique e-mail addresses (note that some folks
use unique per-list addresses):
$ sort -u */membership_*`date -I` | wc -l
467
Note also that it appears we have a fairly large number of folks that are
subscribed to "talk", but *NOT* subscribed to "announce".
Theoretically (at least logically) that shouldn't be the case
(in general - typically exceptions being per-list e-mail addresses),
but it is totally under "user" control.
A quick count of that:
$ { sort -u balug-talk/membership_2007-07-24; cat
balug-announce/membership_2007-07-24 balug-announce/membership_2007-07-24; } |
sort | uniq -u | wc -l
174
Perhaps we'll address that in the future (e.g. subscribe "talk" to
"announce" and remove from "announce" e-mail addresses also present on
"talk") ... but for now I'm thinking we'll probably leave it as-is.
Perhaps when we're about ready to move the lists ... could test that out
a bit, and if such a change would work fine, put such a change
in place at time of migration (of course, with such a change in place,
nothing would automagically prevent an e-mail address from then
subscribing to both lists ... but perhaps we could set up something
that would automagically deal with that).
[View Less]
As discussed on the lists before (and reasons given, etc.) the BALUG
lists are to be publicly archived. Looks like quite recently
someone or something changed that ... anyway, I've changed them back
to being publicly archived again.
So, I was thinking ...:
http://www.new.balug.org/images/balug/logo_fortune_cookie.gif
Not too radically different, but work in the fortune cookie, retain the
Four Seas Restaurant logo, ...
I was thinking put it on the BALUG site (in place of the "regular" logo)
from 2007-08-06 (first day of LinuxWorld - conference & on-site registration
open that day, Expo opens the following day), and have it up there
through ... 2007-09-06 ... that would give it a full month, and span
a BALUG meeting.
I …
[View More]was thinking perhaps put the image up as an image map, and having the
portion including and closely around the fortune cookie part of the image
be a link to a page giving more information on why we did the fortune cookie,
contribution acknowledgements, etc.
[View Less]
In case you didn't see it, I did throw open some of the fortune cookie
"discussion" to the "talk" list:
http://lists.balug.org/pipermail/balug-talk-balug.org/2007-July/003962.html
I figure we may get some good/excellent ideas on exactly what to print from
that list, and we might round up some more contributors on the funding (I
also set up separate off-list e-mail alias for contribution pledge stuff).
The more administrivial details, can of course, be "discussed" on the "admin"
list (or off-list when appropriate).
Fortune cookies, etc.
Well, between 2007-07-17 and 2007-07-18, I managed to make several
calls following up on recommended bakeries for having fortune cookies
made up with custom BALUG message inside them.
Here's a (legible) write-up from my notes and associated memory:
Golden Gate Fortune Cookies Co.
56 Ross Alley
San Francisco, CA 94108-1204
1-415-781-3956
just got data (modem?) answers 2007-07-17 ... much better 2007-07-18
1-415-781-3956 --> call 1-415-399-9129 ask for Jennifer
…
[View More]individual wrap (I asked for pricing on individual wrap - I figure if
we're passing them out at LinuxWorld we'd almost certainly want them
individually wrapped)
cookie + printing costs ...
individual wrap $20 per 100 cookies (doesn't include printing)
printing costs (custom message, same message in all cookies - I figure
we can probably do the same message in all cookies - simpler, possibly
less expensive, and folks will be less inclined to hoard the cookies
for their "different" fortunes if they've all got the same message
inside).
$35.00 for qty. 500
$75.00 for qty. 5000
I was mostly asking about qty. 500 to 5000 - we're fairly likely to be
somewhere in that range (or perhaps higher if we come up with support $$).
That would be a total, of e.g.
$135.00 for 500
$1,075.00 for 5000
(presumably that's not including any applicable taxes).
lead time - need approximately one week
Mee Mee Bakery
1328 Stockton St.
San Francisco, CA 94133-3807
1-415-362-3204 ... ask for manager ...
$40.00 per 100 cookies (again, individually wrapped, includes printed
custom message (all the same) in each)
10% off at qty 5000
e.g.:
$200.00 for 500
$1,800.00 for 5000
(presumably that's not including any applicable taxes).
lead time - 3 to 4 days
message - 32 spaces/characters per line, 3 lines
references:
http://lists.balug.org/pipermail/balug-admin-balug.org/2007-July/000375.html
[View Less]
Andrew,
I didn't manage to comb through and find all or most all of the
relevant URLs of information to check out, but here are at least
several key ones:
website transitions & status, etc. (almost current information,
also includes mention of some items we could use a bit more
volunteers/resources on):
http://lists.balug.org/pipermail/balug-admin-balug.org/2007-June/000373.html
BALUG speaker coordination wiki page:
http://www.sf-lug.com/wiki/doku.php?id=balug_speaker_coordination
BALUG …
[View More]web site:
http://www.balug.org/
BALUG lists:
http://www.balug.org/#Lists
fortune cookie background:
http://lists.balug.org/pipermail/balug-admin-balug.org/2007-July/000375.html
and fortune cookie update:
http://lists.balug.org/pipermail/balug-admin-balug.org/2007-July/000385.html
There's been lots of discussion about a (combined) LUG booth at LWE,
much of that discussion - at least what I've seen - has happened on
the SF-LUG list (mostly with subjects containing "LWE", "Linux World"
or "LinuxWorld"):
http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2007q2/date.htmlhttp://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/sf-lug/2007q3/date.html
SF-LUG is a separate LUG, here are their websites:
http://www.sf-lug.org/http://www.sf-lug.com/
Bay Area Debian (BAD) (http://bad.debian.net/) will be
represented (at least a bit) at LinuxWorld at the Debian booth.
There may be quite a number of LUGs represented at the
combined LUG booth at LWE.
new.balug.org (to become www.balug.org) is on the same box as
sf-lug.com
The old BALUG web page (rather dysfunctional and mostly stripped of all
the URLs (mostly commented out) that got broken through prior transitions)
is still accessible as:
http://www.balug.org/index.php
Quoting Michael Paoli <Michael.Paoli(a)cal.berkeley.edu>:
> Andrew,
>
> Sorry I didn't get back to you a bit sooner, ... catching up on
> personal e-mail and such this evening, ...
>
> I did get more information today on getting fortune cookies made up
> with custom message in them. I'll write up a bit more on that and
> also send it to our "admin" list (where more folks get to see it,
> and it's also publicly archived). I've got that and some other
> BALUG stuff to work on and poke at this evening (to the extent I have
> time ... that's one of about 3 things I'm working on this evening).
> One bit of good news on fortune cookies - lead times are a fair bit
> shorter than I guestimated. The longest leadtime that was stated to me
> was one week - and the other bakery stated 3 to 4 days. Of course we
> still have to work out exactly what we want on the little slip of paper
> and such, but we do have some wiggle room - thus far - on the timing.
>
> Anyway, hope to get caught up on most of those bits between now and
> tomorrow morning.
>
> Some things you might want to peek at for starters ...
> BALUG web site:
> http://www.balug.org/
> our lists on there (you might want to subscribe to at least the
> "announce" list, and if you'd like to help out more, subscribing to the
> "admin" list is highly useful, there's also the "talk" list for more
> general LINUX/BALUG discussion). They're all publicly archived (if you
> have time, you can read/skim the "admin" postings over the past few
> months or so (there aren't all that many of them) ... I'll probably
> get around to pointing out some more key ones (and of course there's
> some new bits to send to the list too).
>
> There are e-mail contacts also on our web page ... the ones presently noted
> at the bottom (for webmaster, balug contact, and speaker coordination)
> are probably most useful, and go to the appropriate folks (e.g.
> balug-contact goes presently to me, Dick, and Larry;
> balug-speaker-coordinators goes to about a half dozen of us that work on
> (or at least try to track) speakers/presentations and the coordination
> thereof).
>
> Let me/us know if you want to get added to our balug-speaker-coordinators
> e-mail alias.
[View Less]
I'll update the site and get the announcement out (not necessarily in that
order).
Quoting jim stockford <jim(a)well.com>:
> Who's gonna announce to the balug-talk list? what
> else is there to do in preparation (last-minute)?
> jim
Re-sending because this seems to have gotten lost, the first time.
Quoting jim stockford (jim(a)well.com):
> ...of course! CABAL is a good common point.
> Seems a need for an active point of communication
> to coordinate LUGs for such things as LinuxWorld,
> LinuxPicnic, maybe sharing speaker info....
Just for context, CABAL's own activities at present (aside from
availability of its name to borrow as an umbrella ;-> ) is a medium
traffic LUG mailing list called "conspire"
(…
[View More]http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/conspire) and twice-monthly
meeting / installfest / barbecues in Menlo Park, 2nd and 4th Saturday
evenings. (Next one is this Saturday, 4pm to midnight.)
Communication to coordinate LUGs:
If there is demand, I'd be willing to set up a mailing list for
inter-LUG matters in the Bay Area. That's been tried before on other
people's mail servers at least twice; both times, it didn't really work
very well.
Dumb politics is a severe risk on inter-group discussion fora, and
unfortunately there are people in Bay Area LUGs who don't like or trust
each other. Here is how I would run such a mailing list, and how
in fact I run CABAL's and SVLUG's:
o No mailing-list manager software munging of the Reply-To header.
o Back-postings Web archive completely public; membership roster
accessible to any subscriber.
o No moderation or banning of any non-spammer, non-spewer subscriber,
except in extraordinary circumstances that would be immediately
disclosed to the membership (that I cannot anticipate, but might
be, e.g., activity that would implicate the subscribership base in
criminal activity).
o "Spam" is defined as only what pretty much everyone agrees is such.
o "Spew" is defined as persistent barraging of the mailing list with
nonsense text or other massive text postings that pretty much
everyone can agree is a mere text DoS attack, and not in any
way legitimate postings. This would be like the "poetry bots"
that in the past have auto-posted to some Usenet newsgroups in
an effort to destroy them (e.g., alt.s*i*ntology).
o All listadmin pronouncements (if any) will be clearly disclosed
as speaking in that capacity. I.e., there will be no ambiguity
about what role "hat" the listadmin is speaking in. Any in-force
rules will be publicly disclosed on the Mailman listadmin page
(what, e.g., http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/conspire is
for "conspire").
o No sanctioning of posters merely because other posters/subscribers
express dislike of what the poster is saying. (No dumb primate
politics carried out via the listadmin.) The listadmin's likely
reaction to complaints about someone else's non-spam, non-spew
postings will be to offer to teach the complainer how to use
his/her killfile software, to avoid seeing what bothers him/her.
My preferred listadmin style, in short, is minimal central control,
minimal involvement of the listadmin in what people are permitted to do,
and high transparency / avoidance of backroom dealings. Many people
actually dislike that: They _want_ a listadmin who carefully controls
the tone and content of the mailing list, who intensively manages people
via off-list private-mail discussions about permitted behaviour, and who
enforces a large number of unwritten rules, out of public sight. They
_want_ a listadmin who breaks up arguments, declares threads "dead" if
he judges them likely to offend or to have gone on too long, enforces
civility with threats, and otherwise acts like the parent of misbehaving
children.
Those people, and their preferred sort of listadmin, tend towards
introvert/passive-aggressiveness and a severely high-context style of
communication. The listadmin in such groups is often called the
"listmom". I _could_ name two Bay Area technical groups that currently
have such (long-established, but undisclosed) styles of management for
their mailing lists, and two that used to but don't anymore -- but
won't.
(The passive-aggressives who run, and used to run, respectively, those
four groups specifically dislike _me_, among other people, because I'm
far too in-your-face for their liking. I don't return their dislike in
kind, which probably bugs them, too. ;-> )
LinuxWorld Conference and Expo:
> Rick will probably have ideas and opinions.
Coloured flyers for the LinuxWorld table, about the various groups, are
a very good idea. Here's what I wrote on conspire in response to Jim's
kind offer to have some CABAL literature at the table (quoted in case
the suggestions are useful to others):
---<snip>---
From rick Tue Jul 10 19:24:39 2007
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:24:39 -0700
To: conspire(a)linuxmafia.com
Subject: Re: [conspire] anyone interested in helping represent Conspire at LinuxWorld Expo?
Quoting jim stockford (jim(a)well.com):
> If you'd like to put in a little time at the community
> table (for LUGs) and/or have other ideas as to
> how to promote the conspire mailing list or the
> CABAL activities or anything else related, please
> let me know ASAP--the IDG coordinator is finalizing
> the table arrangements today or tomorrow.
What would really be good, ye CABAL regulars, would be for one of you to
prototype a brief informational flyer about CABAL, suitable for printing
out and stacking at the LWCE community table for LUGs that Jim is
speaking of.
In my experience, the best physical format for a LUG flyer is
quarter-sheet. That is, you design your flyer to have the same text in
each of the four quarters of an 8.5 x 11" sheet, with matching backside
text in the same configuration. You print, photocopy, and cut into
quarters.
Why? Because people tend to lose full letter-sized sheets, having
picked up a million of them and inevitably losing them into ever-growing
piles of same. By contrast, quarter-sheet flyers are kinda cute, and
stand out.
Trifold flyers are almost as good.
If someone could (please) prototype a CABAL flyer and provide electronic
copy, I'll make sure it gets to LWCE.
(I'm really busy with work, and can't spare the time to design flyers
right now.)
---<snip>---
Sharing speaker info:
If you want, join the SVLUG "volunteers" mailing list, where speaker
possibilities are discussed
(http://lists.svlug.org/lists/listinfo/volunteers). SVLUG's cumulative
memory for possible future speakers/topics is supposed to be the TBA
page, http://www.svlug.org/tba.php . That is, when someone comes up
with an idea for a future meeting, it's supposed to go there. Other
SVLUG volunteers are _supposed_ to help maintain that page; they've
mostly not helped, but I manage to keep the list pretty complete,
unaided.
(My point: Please _do_ "poach" SVLUG's possible-speakers list. This
isn't a zero-sum game, they're not SVLUG property, and having the same
speaker give a talk at multiple groups around the Bay Area is a _good_
thing, not a bad one. Disclaimer: I do not properly speak for SVLUG,
and you should consult President Paul Reiber and VP Mark Weisler if you
need official policy.)
Additionally, _many_ good ideas for speakers can be found on SVLUG's
"previous meetings" page, which is complete back to July 1997:
http://www.svlug.org/prevmeet.php
SVLUG has in the past had a "Speaker's Bureau" that specifically tried
to share information with other groups. That isn't present per se at
the moment, but less-formal coordination through lurking on the
low-traffic volunteers list would probably suffice, just as well.
(the ghost of) LinuxPicnic:
The Linux Picnic was founded by a group of individuals in the Sunnyvale
area as an event that was to be run _collectively_ by participating
LUGs (plus one ham-radio group called South Bay Community Network,
sbay.org, or Sbay), with none of them in sole charge of the event, and a
picnic coordinator and treasurer managing the event and funds on behalf
of all the groups, chosen annually by all the groups. Its Internet
presence was at domain "linux10.org" for the first year (10th
anniversary of Linux), and then one other (IIRC, linux11.org), and
then eventually Drew Bertola registered linuxpicnic.org.
In 2006, Henry House, J. Paul Reed, and I noticed that South Bay
Community Network seemed to be acting as if the event had suddenly
become solely theirs to administer, and other groups were merely to
provide volunteer labour for their event. (Drew Bertola had
unfortunately handed over the linuxpicnic.org domain to South Bay
Community Network's then-president, who holds it to this day.)
SVLUG (per SVLUG president J. Paul Reed) and CABAL (per me) agreed to
participate in the 2006 picnic on the condition that the picnic would
continue to be run jointly by all of the participating groups equally,
that therefore the funds collected from sponsors would be those of the
picnic and not grabbed by any one group, etc. Having secured SVLUG and
CABAL's help with event staffing and publicity, South Bay Community
Network then violated that condition: They ran the event as internal
to sbay.org, established a "SIG Charter" for it without consulting any
of the groups, established high-content-control rules for the picnic
discussion mailing list[1] (again) without consulting any of the groups
and with themselves in sole charge of list administration, and rolled
the leftover funds into their own treasury.
New South Bay Community Network president Heather Stern in 2007 asked
for SVLUG's (and other groups') help with the 2007 picnic: I pointed
out the ongoing bad faith and unilateral removal of the other groups
from event planning / administration. Heather denied that anything had
changed. I challenged her to make good on that:
If you assert that I'm wrong, prove it: Solicit offers from the
Bay Area Linux groups for a treasurer (Henry House of LUGOD or
anyone else) to manage and spend the picnic's incoming funds on
behalf of _all_ the constituent groups, and not just on behalf of
Sbay. Then make clear that the picnic coordinator and treasurer
are answerable to the numerous participating groups -- as was the
case traditionally -- and not uniquely to Sbay.
Heather made no reply whatsoever. We of the Bay Area Linux groups are
valued only as a source of free labour and publicity.
Thread starts here:
http://lists.svlug.org/archives/volunteers/2007q1/000140.html
In short, I'd love to put together a Bay Area Linux Picnic again, and
think 2008 should be what we shoot for. (We'll need a new Internet
domian.) Meanwhile, I'm certainly intending to attend the 2007 Sbay
Picnic, and think it's really nice of a ham-radio group to furnish a
barbecue picnic for Bay Area Linux users.
What I'm not going to do is help staff or publicise that ham group's
event, especially given their history of bad faith and their destruction
of the community's participation. CABAL will not participate in Sbay's
event, ditto. I hope that SVLUG won't, given the bad faith on the other
side.
[1] Among those: Any citation of postings there to elsewhere, impliedly
even one's own, is considered an "actionable offense" meriting banning,
etc. Also, the membership roster is available only to the listadmin,
and the back-postings archive is hidden from public view. The listadmin
has a history of silencing critics by gagging their on-list posting
ability or ejecting them, and then not informing the list membership,
allegedly sponsoring groups, or other responsible parties. This is of
course a perfect example of the passive-aggressive "listmom" style of
mailing list administration that I abhor.
----- End forwarded message -----
[View Less]
Perhaps a bit late - or maybe not too late, ...
Since there seems to be an open question of exactly what user groups
will be represented and/or have volunteers at such booth(s) at
LinuxWorld - and that might not even be known reasonably well in advance,
perhaps a logical "group" to have such a combined booth under would be
CABAL - Consortium of All Bay Area Linux
That would leave enough flexibility to cover whatever groups end up
participating, I would think.
Anyway, just a thought.
There …
[View More]might be "issues" with that in some ways, though, ...
at least for LinuxWorld Expo ... for the .org pavilion, I think they
require the "group" have a .org web site. I can't think of any other
"gottcha's" that jump out at me off the top of my head.
references/excerpts:
http://linuxmafia.com/cabal/
Quoting jim stockford <jim(a)well.com>:
>
>
> Dear LUG honcho,
>
> Would you like your LUG represented at LinuxWorld Expo?
> If so, at the very least, let Briana know immediately
> per email thread below.
>
> Please also, if you're inclined, let jim(a)well.com know.
> I know that LUGOD is interested, tho' I can't speak for
> them (Bill Kendricks may be able to).
>
> It would be helpful to us all to coordinate a bit,
> maybe hand out each others' promo and educational
> material, make sure the booth has someone at it as
> often as possible (i.e. create and coordinate shifts).
>
>
> --------------------------
>
> From Briana:
> I will hold off on ordering until tomorrow.
> I appreciate your help.
>
> ____________________________
> Briana Pontremoli
> Marketing Manager
> IDG World Expo
> 3 Speen Street, Suite 320
> Framingham, MA 01701
[View Less]
